Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 2 Current »

Add your comments directly to the page. Include links to any relevant research, data, or feedback.

Status

IN PROGRESS

Impact

HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW

Driver

Dennis Kittrell (Deactivated) 

Approver

Contributors

Eric Sethna 

Informed

Due date

Outcome

Background

T-Systems is taking longer than expected and per Elias is quite lost. Since we have a big push from many customers for CBA (specifically mobile) and this is a blocker, I am proposing that we take this on internally.

Relevant data

After speaking with Elias, he agrees that we should build this ourselves (especially given the demographic of those demanding the feature).

According to Elias, we will have to push Multi-Server feature out 1 month to work on CBA for Android. Since CBA for Android is a blocker for many large customers, and multi-server is not, we agree that CBA is higher priority.

Options considered

Option 1:

Option 2:

Description

Wait for T-Systems

Build internally

Pros and cons

(plus) We can continue building multi-server feature without interruption

(minus) Unknown timeframe on a highly demanded feature

(plus) We can plan and build to our standards

(plus) We are more efficient and know our software better

(minus) We will have to push Multi-Server out 1 month

Estimated cost

SMALL

MEDIUM

Action items

  •  

Outcome

  • No labels